![]() |
||
|
CONSUMER BLOGROLL Consumer Protection Media, Democracy, Law & Culture |
U.S. PIRG Consumer Blog October 31, 2009:
If you've ever paid a $35 debit overdraft fee for a $4 latte and would have preferred that your bank reject the transaction, it's time to call Congress. If you didn't know that without your permission your bank signed you up for fee-laden "courtesy" overdraft instead of asking you whether you wanted the much better deal of an overdraft line of credit, it's time to call Congress. Put down the coffee and pick up the phone. Call 202-224-3121, that's the switchboard, and ask your Representative to support Rep. Carolyn Maloney's HR 3904, The Overdraft Protection Act of 2009. Then, call back and ask your two Senators to support the Senate version, S. 1799, the FAIR Overdraft bill from Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT). Ask your friends to do the same. Here's why. Despite an overwhelming slam-dunk policy victory by outnumbered consumer witnesses at yesterday's House hearing on reform of overdraft "protection" schemes that could earn banks and some credit unions up to $38 billion this year, passage of Rep. Carolyn Maloney's (D-NY) tough reform legislation is not guaranteed. Big banks, small banks (and those credit unions that have lost their way and no longer place their members first), backed by their well-heeled cadres of in-house, association and outside hired-gun lobbyists and consultants, have mounted a last-ditch assault to defeat the widely-supported HR 3904, The Overdraft Protection Act of 2009. While the Associated Press reported that the phalanx of bank and other pro-fee witnesses all claimed that "customers want the protection," the LA Times reported: Continue reading "Banks oppose reform of unfair bounced overdraft fees, your calls needed" Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 06:34 AM | Comments (0) Small toymakers continue to complain about the new Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, passed into law after millions of lead-laden and other hazardous toys from Mattel and others but made in China washed onto our shores in waves in 2007 and 2008. The innumerable dangerous toy recalls galvanized decades of previously unsuccessful efforts to restore the tiny, embattled CPSC's ability to protect the public from the 15,000 separate hazards it regulates (including toys). Yet, as our colleague Nancy Cowles of Kids In Danger told Leslie Wayne of the New York Times for the story Burden of Safety Law Imperils Small Toymakers, powerful multi-national toy companies are using the ma-and-pa firms as cover in their efforts to weaken the law: “These groups are not above using the small crafters to reopen the legislation and get the changes they want.” Ms. Cowles also said parents needed to be assured that their children’s toys were safe, regardless of who made or sold them. “From a product safety standpoint, it doesn’t make a difference whether the toy comes from a local store or a national chain,” said Ms. Cowles. “A child doesn’t know the difference and parents have the right to expect a safe product.”Expect PIRG's annual Trouble In Toyland report sometime around Thanksgiving. Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 05:27 AM | Comments (0) October 30, 2009:
We've signed onto testimony by Jean Ann Fox of the Consumer Federation of America, to be delivered this morning at a hearing (other testimony is here) of the House Financial Services Committee. A markup vote will occur next week. Several of our consumer colleagues, from CRL and Consumers Union, will testify and are joined by a witness from the North Carolina State Employees Credit Union -- one of the good credit unions that doesn't copycat the banks and gouge its member-customers with unfair overdraft protection fees. In addition to these witnesses, a veritable parade of industry witnesses will attempt to answer the questions: Our most recent testimony on overdraft fees is here. Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 08:28 AM | Comments (0) October 29, 2009:
A new U.S. PIRG report called Who Slows the Pace of Tax Reforms? profiles a dozen powerful corporations that have signed onto one or more letters from the PACE coalition, a group that stridently opposes international tax reform. The report shows how this “dirty dozen” benefits from lucrative federal contracts, yet do not pay their fair share of taxes and spend heavily to block tax reform. (Here is the release) Highlights include these facts: The report is by Nicole Tichon, our tax reform advocate, and Lisa Gilbert, our democracy advocate. Posted by Ed Mierzwinski
at 11:46 AM
| Comments
(0)
October 28, 2009:
Because, they are phishing scams seeking to take your information, then take your money. The FDIC says: Continue
reading "Don't click on phish-y emails claiming to be from FDIC " Posted by Ed Mierzwinski
at 05:52 PM
| Comments
(0)
Privacy experts Joel Reidenberg and Jamela Debelak at Fordham Law School's Center on Law and Information Policy have released (their release, their report) an important new study. From Nick Anderson's Washington Post lede in his story States mismanage student information, study concludes: Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 04:38 PM | Comments (0) Top House and Senate Democrats have offered new legislation on tax dodges (AP via New York Times). Statement from U.S. PIRG Tax and Budget Reform Advocate Nicole Tichon: “Holding foreign banks and corporations accountable for their clients can only help the process of ending bank secrecy. However, the bill can certainly be improved by giving the U.S. government even stronger enforcement mechanisms and by taking bold action against offshore shell companies.” Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 06:34 AM | Comments (0) Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) has announced a markup vote on the Consumer Financial Protection Agency for Thursday at 10 am. The committee has not released a base text or proposed amendments yet. E&C has the right to consider FTC-related matters and matters related to governance of the new agency. Industry opponents are seeking members to offer amendments to weaken both the CFPA and FTC's authority to conduct rulemakings and -- of course -- to preempt stronger state laws. Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 06:27 AM | Comments (0) October 26, 2009:
We're asking Congress and the FTC to investigate reports first broken by Evan Hendricks and his Privacy Times newsletter that, as professor Brian Wolfman notes in his Public Citizen Law and Policy blog entry, "the fact that a consumer has disputed her credit report can undermine her ability to get a home loan, even when the consumer was correct in the dispute." Continue
reading "Credit scoring models may deny consumers who take advantage of legal rights" Posted by Ed Mierzwinski
at 05:56 PM
| Comments
(0)
From Senator Chris Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee: Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 05:44 PM | Comments (0) |
Categories Archives
October 2009
September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 Recent Entries Banks oppose reform of unfair bounced overdraft fees, your calls needed Safe toys, no matter where purchased $35 overdraft fee with that $4 latte? Hearing today. PIRG: A dirty dozen powerful interests slowing tax reform Don't click on phish-y emails claiming to be from FDIC Privacy-intrusive K-12 data collection may be extended to college students New bill on tax dodgers offered House Energy and Commerce to consider consumer agency tomorrow Credit scoring models may deny consumers who take advantage of legal rights Dodd: Freeze credit card rate increases now! Consumer Project Archives |
||||
|
218
D. Street, SE Washington, DC 20003 |