logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Food Safety

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
2005-05-12
Contact:
Liz Hitchcock
(202) 546-9707
A U.S. PIRG News Release

United States Ignores American Consumers and Seeks to End International Talks that Would Create Standards to Label Genetically Engineered Foods

WASHINGTON—As international food safety and trade talks commenced in Malaysia this week, the United States pushed to permanently remove the issue of labeling genetically engineered foods from the agenda and to ignore the overwhelming support of American consumers and countries around the world for comprehensive labeling guidelines for foods containing genetically engineered ingredients.


More than 50 member nations of the World Trade Organization are meeting this week in Malaysia to discuss international standards for food labeling. The 33rd Session of the Codex Committee on Food Labeling was held May 9-13; this is the 13th year that the joint food standard-setting body of the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization has discussed the labeling of genetically engineered foods.

"Polls consistently show that 70-90 percent of Americans want foods that contain genetically engineered ingredients to be labeled," said Kerry-Ann T. Powell staff attorney for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group. "Yet, the U.S. has been the roadblock to comprehensive international standards moving forward."

International standards would provide guidance to countries that choose to implement requirements to label genetically engineered foods. It would also protect countries that have mandatory labeling from a possible U.S.-led WTO challenge, given that the U.S. is the number one producer of genetically engineered agriculture.

In its white paper "At a Standstill: The United States' Role in Stalling International Efforts to Label Genetically Engineered Foods", U.S. PIRG detailed the 12-year battle to develop international labeling standards for foods containing genetically engineered ingredients and called on the U.S. delegation to relieve the gridlock. Instead, the U.S. sought to undermine 12 years of work and disregard American consumers' support for mandatory labeling. The final outcome was to postpone progress once again and allow a smaller working group of countries, including the U.S., to discuss the standards and return them to the full body at the next session.

"It's a shame that the U.S. continues to disregard American consumers and instead prioritizes the interest of the biotechnology industry," said Powell. "Consumers have a right to know whether their foods contain genetically engineered ingredients."

SEARCH THIS SITE