logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Financial Privacy & Security News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
2009-06-24
Contact:
Nicole Tichon, (202) 546-9707
Ed Mierzwinski, 202-461-3821
Steve Blackledge, 916-448-4516
Washington, D.C.

Washington, D.C.: Bailout Transparency Improves, But Still Falls Far Short

WASHINGTON, June 24 – The administration’s efforts to bring transparency and accountability to the $700 billion bailout came close to failing on the U.S. Public Interest Research Group’s latest Bailout Report Card, squeaking by with mostly “Cs.” (Click here to download the report.)

While the grades are not impressive, they do represent an improvement from the first Bailout Report Card for the previous administration, which earned almost entirely “Fs.” The Barack Obama administration even earned one “A,” for requiring banks who receive taxpayer money to report on lending.

Released in February of 2009 in conjunction with the report, Failed Bailout: Lessons for Obama From Bush’s Failures on TARP, the first Report Card noted how little was known about the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), the participants, the strategies and where the money went. To that end, U.S. PIRG created a Report Card on transparency in the hope that the next administration would answer these very basic questions and begin to hold the banks accountable for how the money was spent.

“The Department of Treasury has responded to varying degrees to calls for program information, greater up front planning, reporting on lending practices and details on participants – all of which were completely ignored by the previous administration,” Nicole Tichon, U.S. PIRG’s Tax & Budget Advocate and author of the report, explained.

“However, it’s not always clear how these plans and taxpayer protections will work and to whom they’ll apply. Also, many of the reforms only apply to future participants, while the banks that received the biggest cash injections aren’t subject to them. To a large extent, regulators have shut the barn door after the horses are gone – leaving the public both in debt and in the dark,” Tichon added.

The Report Card shows improvement as a result of the administration’s establishment of online resources, documentation, reporting requirements and taxpayer protection principles for at least some of the programs. But marks improved only marginally for accountability of how the money has been spent, consistent application of governance reforms, as well as clarity around the program’s strategy for meeting goals.

“Aside from keeping financial institutions solvent, the program doesn’t appear to be accomplishing its goals as they relate to American families. There hasn’t been an increase in lending or a decrease in foreclosures. At some point the Administration needs to decide when to stop throwing money at banks. And better reporting and more accountability will help them make those decisions responsibly,” Tichon noted.

- # # # -

U.S. PIRG, federation of state Public Interest Research Groups, is a non-profit, non-partisan public interest advocacy organization. For more information on the Challenging the Bailout Program, click here.

SEARCH THIS SITE