News Release

U.S. PIRG and 38 others Call for Support of the Shareholder Protection Act

Act would require corporations to disclose and get sign-off from shareholders to spend on elections
For Immediate Release


Diverse Coalition of 39 Civic Groups Call on Congress to Pass the Shareholder Protection Act

Corporate Political Spending Must Be Subject to Scrutiny by Shareholders, Open to the Public

Today a diverse coalition of groups sent a letter to Congress endorsing the Shareholder Protection Act, sponsored by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) in the Senate and Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.) in the House.

In response to the onslaught of corporate spending in federal, state and judicial elections caused by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, the groups called upon Congress to establish procedures of corporate governance that would involve shareholders in corporate political spending decisions and inform the public of corporate spending in elections.

The call for approval of the Shareholder Protection Act was made by 39 organizations and individuals representing very diverse backgrounds, ranging from environmental and religious groups to institutional investors and labor unions.

“Our organizations come from diverse backgrounds, with concerns ranging from constitutional rights to corporate governance to protecting our air and water,” notes the letter. “We have many different priorities, but we all agree that the unprecedented 2010 Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, requires a strong response.”

The Shareholder Protection Act would:

  • Require shareholders to authorize, on an annual basis, a political activities budget of up to a certain amount of money to be set by the corporation. 
  • Mandate that fiduciaries voting on behalf of their investors disclose that vote to investors.
  • Require the Board of directors to authorize each political expenditure over $50,000 within the overall budget approved by shareholders.
  • Disclose specific corporate political expenditures online within 48 hours and to shareholders and the SEC on a quarterly basis.

The letter concludes: “Responsible corporate governance requires the involvement of informed shareholders and is not a partisan issue. We believe that holding management accountable and ensuring that political spending decisions are made transparently and in pursuit of sound business is important for both the market and for democracy.”

The complete letter is posted below.

 

April 25, 2013

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, D.C.  20515

United States Senate

Washington, D.C.  20510

RE:  Support the Shareholder Protection Act

Dear Member of Congress:

We write to you to encourage your support of the Shareholder Protection Act, sponsored by Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA) and Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ).

Our organizations come from diverse backgrounds, with concerns ranging from constitutional rights to corporate governance to protecting our air and water. We have many different priorities, but we all agree that the unprecedented 2010 Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, requires a strong response.

We are troubled for several reasons by the Supreme Court’s decision to give corporations the right under the First Amendment to spend unlimited funds from their corporate treasuries to support or attack candidates.

In the electoral arena, this decision has brought a flood of new and secretive money into elections, ratcheting up the cost of campaigns and increasing the time and resources needed for fundraising. Spending by outside groups funded largely by corporate interests and intended to influence the 2010 elections was more than four times as high than in 2006, the last mid-term cycle. Outside spending increased another four-fold again in the 2012 election cycle. The sources of much of this new money swamping our elections remains undisclosed, as corporations and other special interests launder their campaign funds through non-profit groups, such as the Chamber of Commerce, which are not required to disclose their donors. The ads funded by unaccountable corporate interests fueled massive attacks that compounded the negative tone of campaigns and added to the public cynicism of our elections.

In the legislative arena, the mere threat of unlimited corporate political spending gives corporate lobbyists a large new club to wield when lobbying lawmakers, and makes it harder for legislators to vote their conscience.

In corporate governance, unless a company sets its own internal policies otherwise, there are no rules or procedures established in the United States to ensure that shareholders – those who actually own the wealth of corporations – are informed of, or have the right to approve, decisions on spending their money on politics.

The Shareholder Protection Act provides a framework to rein in some of the damage in this troubling, new political landscape.

Specifically, the Act would:

  • Mandate prior approval by shareholders for an annual political expenditure budget chosen by the management for a publicly held corporation.
  • Require that each specific corporate political expenditure over a certain dollar threshold be approved by the Board of Directors and promptly disclosed to shareholders and the public.
  • Require that institutional investors inform all persons in their investment funds how they voted on corporate political expenditures.
  • Post on the Securities Exchange Commission web page how much each corporation is spending on elections and which candidates or issues they support or oppose.

American business leaders are concerned about the pressure on business to donate to political campaigns, and the influx of large, undisclosed donations to third party political organizations that are not required to disclose their sources of funding. In a Zogby International poll commissioned by the business-led Committee for Economic Development (CED), two-thirds of business leaders polled agreed with the statement: “the lack of transparency and oversight in corporate political activity encourages behavior that puts corporations at legal risk and endangers corporate reputations.”

In addition to business leaders, the general public at large believes in transparency and giving shareholders a voice. A 2012 survey conducted by Bannon Communications for the Corporate Reform Coalition found that more than 8 in 10 Americans (81%) believe that the secret flow of campaign spending is bad for democracy, and 87 percent agree that prompt disclosure of political spending would help voters, customers and shareholders hold companies accountable for political behavior.  Huge majorities of Americans across the political spectrum condemn corporate political spending and support strong reforms. For example, requiring corporations to get shareholder approval before spending money on politics is supported by 73 percent of both Republicans and Democrats, and 71 percent of Independents. About 84 percent of Americans agree that corporate political spending drowns out the voices of average Americans, and 83 percent believe that corporations and corporate CEOs have too much political power and influence.

Responsible corporate governance requires the involvement of informed shareholders and is not a partisan issue. We believe that holding management accountable and ensuring that political spending decisions are made transparently and in pursuit of sound business is important for both the market and for democracy.

We urge you to support the reasoned response that is the Shareholder Protection Act.

Sincerely,

Brennan Center for Justice at N.Y.U. School of Law

Center for Media and Democracy

Chesapeake Climate Action Network

Citizen Works

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)

Coffee Party USA

Common Cause

Corporate Accountability International

Corporate Ethics International/Business Ethics Network

Democrats.com

Demos

Free Speech for People

Friends of the Earth

Greenpeace

Harrington Investments, Inc.

Holy Cross International Justice Office

Illinois Campaign for Political Reform

Krull and Company, Peter W. Krull, President & Founder

League of Conservation Voters

Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns

National Consumers League

New Progressive Alliance

North Carolina Center for Voter Engagement

NorthStar Asset Management, Inc.

Ohio Citizen Action

People for the American Way

Progressive States Network

Public Campaign

Public Citizen

Service Employees International Union (SEIU)

Social Equity Group, Ron Freund and Duncan Meaney

Strategic Counsel on Corporate Accountability, Sanford Lewis

Sunlight Foundation

Torres-Spelliscy, Ciara

U.S. Public Interest Research Group (US PIRG)

United Food and Commercial Workers

West Virginia Citizen Action

Wisconsin Democracy Campaign

Zevin Asset Management, LLC

Priority Action

The overuse of antibiotics on factory farms is threatening the effectiveness of lifesaving antibiotics. Call on the Obama administration to put an end to the worst practices.

Support Us

Your donation supports U.S. PIRG’s work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.

Consumer Alerts

Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.