|
U.S. PIRG Consumer Blog
« Pearlstein: Bush's Raw Deal For Consumers |
Main
| Stupid government tricks: leaving SSNs in plain view for years »
April 20, 2007
PIRG, EPIC, CDD file Google complaint at FTC
We've joined the Electronic Privacy Information Center and the Center for Digital Democracy in an important complaint to the Federal Trade Commission (Washington Post story today by Ellen Nakashima explaining complaint) challenging the announced merger of the online powerhouse Google with the ad-server giant Doubleclick. The filing urges the FTC to consider the effects of the information collection regime that the merger creates. Before it can go forward we want the FTC to ask: if Google can record, analyze, track, and profile the activities of Internet users with newly-available abilities to combine data that are personally identifiable and data that are not personally identifiable, how can privacy be ensured? We also urge the FTC to require Google to publicly present a plan to comply with the recognized gold standard rule for information collection: the OECD Privacy Guidelines. Finally, we make it clear that the federal government must also consider the antitrust implications of the combination before allowing it to go forward.
Co-filer Jeff Chester of the Center for Digital Democracy has a recent column The War Against Google in The Nation along with a number of recent blog entries explaining the issues. In November, PIRG and CDD had filed a previous FCC complaint asking for FTC action against Microsoft, Google and others for a broad variety of new behavioral tracking practices that fail to guarantee Internet privacy and may subject conusmers to price discrimination (weblining) and other harms. Privacy on the Internet, to the extent that it is guaranteed at all, is protected largely through privacy policies, not by enforceable privacy rights. The two complaints, together, raise troubling questions about how new technologies have enabled the collection and use of massive consumer information resources by Internet firms, for a variety of behavioral, consumer control and other purposes without any government oversight, consumer knowledge or consent or any ethical consideration of the implications on consumer lives. Yet, the technologies also afford an historic opportunity to protect privacy, if used fairly.
Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at April 20, 2007 06:15 AM
Post a comment
|