logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Search

By Ed Mierzwinski - 11/3/2009 Consumers can comment until November 30th on proposed FTC rules to rein in freecreditreport.com and similar sites designed to take your money with the promise of something free that isn't. As I reported recently, the new credit card law reinstated to the FTC broader authority that a previous FTC had foolishly tossed away in a weak previous settlement with the credit bureau Experian, which allowed it to continue to aggressively market over-priced, nearly-useless subscription-based credit monitoring at freecreditreport.com. Instead of paying $14.95/month to Experian, get a real free credit report, I point out. As Ron Lieber reports in his story in today's New York Times, it's a nearly billion-dollar a year rip-off and the credit card companies get huge kickbacks (excuse me, I meant "commissions") for signing their customers up: "While other companies sell credit monitoring too, Experian is the

By Ed Mierzwinski - 11/2/2009 We're coordinating the unprecedented event in coalition: U.S. Public Interest Research Group, Main Street Alliance, Small Business Majority, and Consumers Union.  

By Ed Mierzwinski - 11/2/2009 Law professor and historian of the consumer movement Norm Silber de-bunks banker opposition to the Consumer Financial Protection Agency here at his blog, where he recalls car company ads:

By Ed Mierzwinski - 10/31/2009 If you've ever paid a $35 debit overdraft fee for a $4 latte and would have preferred that your bank reject the transaction, it's time to call Congress. If you didn't know that without your permission your bank signed you up for fee-laden "courtesy" overdraft instead of asking you whether you wanted the much better deal of an overdraft line of credit, it's time to call Congress. Put down the coffee and pick up the phone. Call 202-224-3121, that's the switchboard, and ask your Representative to support Rep. Carolyn Maloney's HR 3904, The Overdraft Protection Act of 2009. Then, call back and ask your two Senators to support the Senate version, S. 1799, the FAIR Overdraft bill from Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT). Ask your friends to do the same. Here's why.Despite an overwhelming slam-dunk policy victory by outnumbered consumer witnesses at yesterday's House hearing on reform of overdraft "protection" schemes that could earn banks and some credit unions up to $38 billion this year, passage of Rep. Carolyn Maloney's (D-NY) tough reform legislation is not guaranteed. Big banks, small banks (and those credit unions that have lost their way and no longer place their members first), backed by their well-heeled cadres of in-house, association and outside hired-gun lobbyists and consultants, have mounted a last-ditch assault to defeat the widely-supported HR 3904, The Overdraft Protection Act of 2009. While the Associated Press reported that the phalanx of bank and other pro-fee witnesses all claimed that "customers want the protection," the LA Times reported:
"Don't do people favors without asking them," Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, warned industry representatives.
At the hearing, our colleague Jean Ann Fox of the Consumer Federation of America reported in PIRG-backed testimony (see page 9 of testimony)that consumers don't want the fees:
CFA polled a representative sample of adult Americans in July 2009 and learned that 71 percent support requiring banks to gain the permission of customers before routinely providing loans to cover overdrafts.

By Ed Mierzwinski - 10/31/2009 Small toymakers continue to complain about the new Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, passed into law after millions of lead-laden and other hazardous toys from Mattel and others but made in China washed onto our shores in waves in 2007 and 2008. The innumerable dangerous toy recalls galvanized decades of previously unsuccessful efforts to restore the tiny, embattled CPSC's ability to protect the public from the 15,000 separate hazards it regulates (including toys). Yet, as our colleague Nancy Cowles of Kids In Danger told Leslie Wayne of the New York Times for the story Burden of Safety Law Imperils Small Toymakers, powerful multi-national toy companies are using the ma-and-pa firms as cover in their efforts to weaken the law:
“These groups are not above using the small crafters to reopen the legislation and get the changes they want.” Ms. Cowles also said parents needed to be assured that their children’s toys were safe, regardless of who made or sold them. “From a product safety standpoint, it doesn’t make a difference whether the toy comes from a local store or a national chain,” said Ms. Cowles. “A child doesn’t know the difference and parents have the right to expect a safe product.”
Expect PIRG's annual Trouble In Toyland report sometime around Thanksgiving.

SEARCH THIS SITE


Ed Mierzwinski

U.S. PIRG Consumer Program Director
Contact Ed

Tell us what you think!

To leave a comment, click here to register for an account, then click "Reply" at the bottom of the post.

Already have an account? Click here to log in.


Blogroll